BEST PRACTICES

AI SRE Best Practices: Scaling from 10 to 10,000 Incidents

Production-tested strategies for implementing AI SRE at scale without breaking your infrastructure

By Shafi KhanJune 16, 202515 min read

I've watched teams implement AI SRE. The ones that succeed follow a playbook. The ones that fail ignore it and wonder why their $200k platform sits unused.

This isn't theory. These are battle-tested best practices from teams running AI SRE at massive scale: 10,000+ incidents/month, 500+ microservices, 24/7 production loads. If you're implementing AI SRE, this is your survival guide.

1. Start Small, Scale Fast (The 80/20 Rule)

The #1 mistake: trying to automate everything on day one. Instead, apply the 80/20 rule.

The Right Way to Ramp Up

Week 1-2: Identify Your Top 5 Incident Patterns

Run this query on your incident history:

SELECT 
  incident_type, 
  COUNT(*) as frequency,
  AVG(mttr_minutes) as avg_resolution_time
FROM incidents
WHERE created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '90 days'
GROUP BY incident_type
ORDER BY frequency DESC
LIMIT 5;

These top 5 patterns represent 80% of your toil. Start here.

Week 3-4: Automate Pattern #1 Only

Pick the most repeatable, lowest-risk pattern. Example:

  • Pattern: "Pod OOMKilled → restart"
  • Frequency: 50x/month
  • Risk: Low (reversible in seconds)
  • Success Rate: 95%+ (proven fix)

Nail this one pattern before moving to the next.

Month 2-3: Add 2-3 More Patterns

Once Pattern #1 runs flawlessly for 30 days with <2% regression rate, add:

  • • Redis timeout → flush cache
  • • Disk full → clear old logs
  • • Connection pool exhausted → restart service

❌ What NOT to Do

"Let's automate all 47 incident types at once!"

→ Result: Overwhelmed team, 20% false positive rate, loss of trust, project abandoned in 60 days.

2. Build the Runbook Library First

AI SRE is only as good as your runbooks. If your runbooks are tribal knowledge ("ask Sarah, she knows"), AI can't help.

The Gold Standard Runbook Template

# Runbook: [SERVICE_NAME] - [INCIDENT_TYPE]

## 1. Symptoms (How do I know this is happening?)
- Alert: [ALERT_NAME]
- Error message: [EXACT ERROR TEXT]
- Metrics: [e.g., "CPU >90% for 5 min"]

## 2. Diagnosis (How do I confirm?)
```bash
kubectl logs -n prod [SERVICE_NAME] --tail=100 | grep "ERROR"
curl https://[SERVICE_NAME]/health
```

## 3. Resolution (Step-by-step fix)
```bash
# Step 1: Restart pod
kubectl rollout restart deployment/[SERVICE_NAME] -n prod

# Step 2: Verify health
kubectl get pods -n prod | grep [SERVICE_NAME]

# Step 3: Monitor for 5 min
watch -n 10 'curl -s https://[SERVICE_NAME]/health'
```

## 4. Rollback Plan (If fix doesn't work)
```bash
kubectl rollout undo deployment/[SERVICE_NAME] -n prod
```

## 5. Prevention (How do we stop this recurring?)
- Root cause: [e.g., "Memory leak in user-session cache"]
- Long-term fix: [e.g., "Add TTL to cache, increase memory limits"]
- Owner: [TEAM/PERSON]
- Due: [DATE]

## 6. AI Training Data
- Confidence: 95% (works in 19/20 incidents)
- Blast radius: Low (single service)
- Reversibility: Instant (rollback in 30s)
- Auto-approve: YES (after 30-day shadow mode)

This is the format AI needs. Every runbook should be this detailed.

✅ Good Runbook

  • • Exact commands (copy-paste ready)
  • • Success criteria ("Pod shows Running")
  • • Rollback plan (if fix fails)
  • • Confidence score (based on history)

❌ Bad Runbook

  • • "Try restarting it"
  • • "Check the logs"
  • • "Escalate to backend team"
  • • No commands, no specifics

3. Measure Everything (The Metrics That Matter)

"You can't improve what you don't measure." Here are the 7 metrics every AI SRE team should track:

MetricTargetWhy It Matters
Auto-Resolution Rate>70%% of incidents AI fixes without human involvement
MTTR (Automated)<5 minTime from alert → resolution (AI-handled incidents)
Regression Rate<2%% of AI fixes that made things worse
False Positive Rate<5%% of incidents flagged incorrectly
Time to Approval<30 secHow long humans take to approve AI suggestions
Team Satisfaction>8/10Do SREs trust the AI? (monthly survey)
Pages Reduced>60%Reduction in human pages vs. pre-AI baseline

Weekly Review Ritual

Every Monday, review these 7 metrics with your team. Ask:

  • Which metrics improved? (celebrate wins)
  • Which metrics got worse? (investigate root cause)
  • Are we ready to enable auto-remediation for a new pattern?

4. The "Shadow Mode" Phase is Non-Negotiable

Teams that skip shadow mode regret it. Shadow mode = AI watches but doesn't act. Here's why it matters:

What Shadow Mode Does

  • Builds trust: Team sees AI's RCA quality before automation
  • Tunes confidence: Learn which thresholds work
  • Finds gaps: Discovers missing runbooks
  • Zero risk: AI can't break anything

What Happens When You Skip It

  • Team panic: "AI is changing prod without asking!"
  • High regression rate: AI makes mistakes (not tuned yet)
  • Trust destroyed: One bad auto-remediation kills adoption
  • Project abandoned: "Turn it off, back to manual"

Shadow Mode Checklist (30 Days Minimum)

AI posts "What I would have done" to Slack after every incident
Team reviews AI suggestions daily: "Would this have worked?"
>80% of AI suggestions match what human eventually did
Team says: "Yeah, AI got it right. We trust it."
No major false positives (AI flagging non-issues)

Only after ALL boxes are checked → Move to approval mode.

5. Tag Services by Risk Level

Not all services are equal. Payment processing ≠ internal analytics dashboard. Use risk tags.

Risk TagExamplesAI Policy
CRITICALpayment, auth, databaseHuman approval ALWAYS (no auto-act)
MEDIUMsearch, recommendationsAuto-act for known patterns only
LOWanalytics, logging, background jobsFull auto-remediation enabled

Implementation Example

# Kubernetes labels for risk tagging
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
  name: payment-service
  labels:
    app: payment
    risk-level: "critical"  # AI will always request approval
    compliance: "pci-dss"   # Extra audit trail required

---

apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
  name: analytics-worker
  labels:
    app: analytics
    risk-level: "low"       # AI can auto-remediate
    compliance: "none"

6. The "One Bad Fix" Rule

If AI makes production worse even once, your team will lose trust. Here's how to prevent it:

Safety Check #1: Dry-Run Before Every New Pattern

Before enabling auto-remediation for a new pattern, test in staging for 7 days:

  • Trigger the incident manually in staging
  • Watch AI fix it 5+ times successfully
  • Confirm no regressions (error rate doesn't increase)
  • Only then: enable in prod

Safety Check #2: Auto-Rollback on Increased Error Rate

After AI takes action, monitor for 5 minutes:

if (error_rate_after_fix > error_rate_before_fix):
    # AI made it worse!
    rollback_last_action()
    alert_human("AI fix backfired - rolled back")
    disable_auto_remediation_for_this_pattern()
    # Require human investigation before re-enabling

Safety Check #3: Break-Glass Override

Humans must ALWAYS be able to stop AI instantly. No friction. No "Are you sure?" dialogs. Just: STOP.

7. Celebrate Wins, Learn from Failures

AI SRE adoption is a culture shift. Treat it like one.

🎉 Celebrate AI Wins

  • • Post in Slack: "AI auto-resolved 50 incidents this week!"
  • • Share MTTR improvements: "3am pages down 80%"
  • • Highlight saved time: "AI saved 40 hours of toil"
  • • Show team what AI fixed while they slept

📚 Learn from AI Failures

  • • Blameless postmortem: "Why did AI suggest wrong fix?"
  • • Was runbook outdated? Update it.
  • • Was confidence threshold too low? Raise it.
  • • Share learnings: "Here's what we fixed"

🎯 Key Takeaways

  • Start small: Automate top 5 patterns (80/20 rule), nail pattern #1 before adding more
  • Runbooks first: AI is only as good as your documentation. Use the gold standard template.
  • Measure everything: Track 7 metrics weekly (auto-resolution rate, MTTR, regression rate, etc.)
  • Shadow mode is non-negotiable: 30 days minimum to build trust before automation
  • Tag by risk: Critical services = human approval always, low-risk = full automation
  • One bad fix kills trust: Use safety checks (dry-run, auto-rollback, break-glass override)

AutonomOps: Built for These Best Practices

Shadow mode? ✓ Risk tagging? ✓ Auto-rollback? ✓ Break-glass override? ✓ AutonomOps has all 7 best practices built-in. Start your free trial today.

SK

About Shafi Khan

Shafi Khan is the founder of AutonomOps AI. These 7 best practices are from Real AI SRE implementations. The patterns that work, and the mistakes to avoid.

Related Articles